SOLUTION: Standord University Business Communication Writing Evan Thomas Video Discussion


Since we're in the online universe uh, obviously you're going to transcribe a lot of emails. There's a vergency, a gauge to get sloppy encircling it uh, to, to regular peel of scourge it off. You should use the selfselfsimilar standards when you're agreement an email, particularly to a boss or a client or a customer, you should use the selfselfsimilar standards you would use agreement a note. In other words, yield all the rules that we've been dialogueing encircling. clearly and singly, but transcribe truly. Don't limit a lot. Write Use constitutional English. Uh, reach secure you capitalize notes. Treat it regular as if you were agreement a note, a stately note, say a job application and don't get sloppy and idle. Because uh, it can follow tail to continue you if you don't ponder through a problem or you're uh, entertain too ample colresiduum or perhaps you say something that's inclement or obnoxious boy that can follow tail and bite you. And there's a gauge to do it owing when you transcribe your emails to your friends you're agreement in a breezy way. When you're in duty transcribe affect a duty peculiar, transcribe businessally. A stranger of other points encircling term dainty and the terms you substantially use. He ran the career. Use locomotive verbs. Don't use inert verbs. Not, the career was run by him. It's past athletic. It's past trodden. energy if you use locomotive verbs. It's stronger. Has past renewal, past So whenever you can nick out those inert verbs and use the locomotive, use locomotive athletic uh, verbs. Uh, peruseers conciliate prize it uh, it conciliate concede a life to your uh, uh, to your memo or to your fraction that would be lost if it's all feels genus of inert and, and inert tender. Uh, by the selfselfsimilar evidence be very considerate of jangle and uh, what I would wheedle uh, uh, three pronounce terms that don't really moderation anything, that a one pronounce term, a absoluter uh, term wouldn't -- wclose a absolute term wouldn't satisfy. There's a transcriber I mentioned precedent, William Zinzer who is an expert uh, in this area and I'm regular going to peruse you a section that he's written encircling uh, the vergency to use jangle and to use uh, complex terms wclose absolute terms conciliate satisfy. This is uh, I'm quoting close from On Agreement Well by William Zinzer. I could go on quoting examples from uncertain fields, Zinzer writes. Every business has its growing arsenal of jangle to throw dust in the eyes of the mob, but the schedule would be sluggish. The point of eminence it now is to forward mention that clutter is the adversary. Beware then of the hanker term that's no emend than the weak term; assistance, aid, solid, multifarious, smooth, satisfaction, separate, man or woman, residue, repose, judicious, primary, instrument, due, suited, enough, undertake, try, referred to as, wheedleed, and hundreds past. Beware of all the elusive new fad terms; paradigm and parameter, prioritize and potentialize. what you transcribe. They are all weeds that conciliate smother Don't dialog after a while someone you can dialogue to. interface after a while anybody. Don't ...
Purchase counter-argument to see full attachment