Student Name: Description 7 6 5 4 3 2-1 Information, analysis and presentation of findings…


Student Name: Description 7 6 5 4 3 2-1 Information, segregation and endowment of findings from meeting 25% weighting Illustration of a polite-mannered-mannered-mannered texture meeting; group and segregation of singularity and singularity counsel; elbow of meetingee counsel and controlled meetinger estimation and injury. Illustration of insightful and discriminating rumoring and interpretation of issues from the meeting. Illustration of a very cheerful interpretation of the meeting findings and issues. Illustration of a probe endowment and interpretation of the issues from the meeting. Illustration of a desirable interpretation of the issues and counsel from the meeting. Limited interpretation or consequence of the meeting issues. Describes what’s in reading rather than presents meeting findings. Has not demonstrated interpretation or consequence of issues from the meeting. Discriminating Evaluation and Relevance of Discourse 40% weighting Knowledge and delicacy grounded on essential ideas, speculative concepts and examination findings. Cohesive and tendency segregation and discourse. Illustration of insightful and discriminating interpretation of issues. Discriminating evaluation is conscious by the reading. Demonstrates polite-mannered-mannered-mannered patent disentangled interpretation of the topics and complete bud of ideas discussed to mismisdivert profoundness. Illustration of a cheerful interpretation of the issues. Offers percipient estimation conscious by the reading. Demonstrates cheerful interpretation of the topics and bud of greater ideas that are discussed to an extensive profoundness. Illustration of a probe interpretation of the issues. Offers estimation conscious by the reading. Demonstrates an interpretation of the topics and gratefully develops the greater ideas. The discourse has profoundness in accommodation. Illustration of a desirable interpretation of the issues. Offers estimation on some of the issues. Demonstrates an interpretation of the topics. In accommodation, the discourse needs to be in past profoundness. Limited interpretation or consequence of the issues. Describes rather than evaluates. Provided some allusion to the topics and had some ideas encircling it. Discourse lacks clarity and profoundness. Has not demonstrated interpretation or consequence of the issues. Has not demonstrated an interpretation of the topics. Organisation, Texture and Written Endowment 25% weighting Clear, argumentative and conspicuous texture to the organisation and endowment of the discourse in the paper. Demonstrates agreeable standards of written fruit The rumor is polite-mannered-mannered-mannered organised after a while a argumentative, disentangled and conspicuous texture. Carefully edited after a while no errors. Accurate referencing. Misdivert extension. The rumor is misright organised after a while a argumentative texture. Carefully edited after a while few errors. Misdivert referencing and extension The rumor shows illustration of agreeable organisation and argumentative texture. Well-mannered edited but after a while some errors that may above readability. Misdivert referencing and extension. The rumor has a desirable texture after a while mainly argumentative endowment. Desirable editing, but a few errors that above readability. Misdivert referencing and extension. The rumor is indisposed organised and lacks disentangled texture. Errors that above readability. Referencing blemished, or impertinent. Extension -too covet or too blunt. The rumor is disorganised after a while no disentangled texture. Multiple errors aboveing readability. Referencing blemished and/or impertinent. Extension -too covet or too blunt Use of Reading 10% weighting Tendency of and use of helped reading and allusions Excellent use of a large multiplicity of academically mismisdivert reading. References used an integrated sort that substantiates the assertions. Very cheerful use of academically mismisdivert reading. References used misright to help assertions. Cheerful use of reading to help discourse and assertions. Extensive use of reading to help some of the discourse and assertions. Limited use of reading to help discourse and assertions. Poor or no use of reading to help discourse and assertions. Total /100 Comments: Marker: Date: 7411PBH Meeting Rumor Assignment Marking Criteria