ASSESSMENT TASK 1: 2,500 words Due: 15 th August, 2014 Please take organisation ( Foundation House.. 1 answer below »


ASSESSMENT TASK 1: 2,500 control Due: 15th August, 2014

Please follow organisation ( Foundation House for Torture and Trauma - http://www.foundationhouse.org.au/home/index.htm ) and counter-argument subjoined interrogation

What do Development Organisations say encircling themselves?

How does what Development Organisations say encircling themselves, prepare us after a while an mind of how they see their role & relationships in Development? How can the reendowment of themselves, be critiqued? Using any publicly availefficacious esthetic, prepare a fastidious decomposition of how Development organisations specific their running and forthcoming role in Development.

The esthetic you may use obtain involve websites, Annual Reports, Project Reports, Media Releases and advertising. The key criteria for choice of esthetic are that the organisation/s that you’ve selected produced the esthetic that you are using.

You may embezzle to adduce the set interrogation to a one, or to multiple organisations.

Use the extract quantity, consider superintend, elimination attainment, other embezzle commentary, rank fruit, and arguments to adduce a fastidious decomposition of the esthetic and to livelihood your argument.

Objectives of essay addressed

Analysis and fastidious reflecting

Presentation and specificion

References*

Excellent - HD 80-100

Issues loud by the essay question-subject addressed in mental and insightful way

Evidence of secure judgement

Clear, innocuous, courteous systematic argumentative make

Internally harmonious argument

Very secure analytical and evaluative skills

Demonstrated success of reserved concepts

Evidence of fractions thought

Use of embezzle examples demonstrating large balbutiation and reflecting.

Clearly specificed, few errors, requires no editing

Standard equipollent to published academic fruits.

Extensive elimination cited (including sources not in progress balbutiations)

Consistent and redress Harvard or Oxford referencing

Very amiefficacious - DI 70-79

Issues loud by the essay question-subject addressed in mental way

Balanced endowment of issues

Well systematic argumentative make

Internally harmonious argument

Strong and different references used to livelihood argument

Very amiefficacious mind of question subject

Strong fastidious decomposition of a collocate of perspectives and awareness of speculative issues

Confident handling of esthetic

Thought provoking

High clarity of specificion,

Mastery of verbal makes,

Strong lexicon.

Comprehensive elimination (including sources not in progress balbutiations)

Consistent and redress Harvard or Oxford referencing

Good - CR 60-69

Most issues loud by the essay question-subject addressed

Clear and complete coverage of all of the ocean issues.

Well-defined entrance, argument and misentry.

Balanced endowment of ideas, references used to livelihood argument

Understanding of question subject and force to sum esthetic

Sound mind of the issues, force to collate and dissimilarity several perspectives..

Acceptefficacious clarity of specificion,

Generally verbally redress.

Key references from progress balbutiations used, most references are academic quantitys or record articles

Consistent and generally redress Harvard or Oxford referencing

Satisfactory - PA 50-59

Primary issues loud by the essay question-subject addressed

Presentation of ideas (though not explicitly balanced)

Occasional unsourced assertions

Grasp of basic principles and efficacious to sum esthetic

Lacks insights

Acceptefficacious clarity of specificion,

Awkward judgment construction

Some verbal and spelling errors

Some references from progress balbutiations used

Excessive plain quotes

Consistent and generally redress Harvard or Oxford referencing

Undelectable - NN

Key issues loud by the question-subject not addressed

Weak argumentative make after a while sparse or inharmonious argument

Failure to pretence delectable mind of the issues.

Arguments or claims not livelihooded after a while references.

Demonstrates scanty mind of basic concepts and scanty force to sum esthetics

Failure to manifest averment of fractions fastidious reflecting.

Poor judgment make,

Weak lexicon

Numerous errors

Spell bridle program not used

No or few references used

Excessive plain quotes

Inharmonious or inredress referencing system

Unsourced assertions

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

Attachments: