Benchmark ethical dilemmas | Literature homework help

My circumstance con-over is-

The questions at the end of each doubt are planned for you to meditate on. For your tract, you must dispose your agreement using the sections and underlined titles listed on the assignment page. Do not observation the circumstance con-over into your essay. 

1. Pornography

TJ privately enjoys pornography. He gets a majestic communicate of satisfaction out of apprehensioning Internet pornography and masturbating, though he constantly acts subjoined shut doors and believes that hisactions own no movables on others. He justifies his action by aphorism, "Who am I mischiefing?"

Then he discovers a statistic on the Global Initiative to Fight Rational Trafficking website (, stating that 43% of rational trafficking victims are used for arduous marketable sexual exploitation, of whom 98% are women and girls, and that the pornography profession is a multibillion dollar assiduity (Global Initiative, n.d.).

His immunity to apprehension pornography is now at odds delay mischief to himself (addiction) and others (affront through arduous trafficking and resources exploitation). (More notification can be root at, which is a recital by William May designated "The Social Costs of Pornography" granted by the Witherspoon Institute out of Princeton [May, 2010].)

How should TJ accord? Should he sustain his lifestyle consequently of his immunity of dainty, or should he exexchange his action consequently of the mischief effected? What is his function for the mischief that the pornography assiduity can action, well-balanced if he himself is not immediately mischiefing someone else?

Write a 1,000-1,500-word essay in which you awaken intellectual thinking and use values-based decomposition-making to harangue a circumstance con-over from the perspective of the Christian worldview. Choose one circumstance con-over from the five libertys listed in the determined "Ethical Dilemmas" instrument.

After an delayhold preparatory portion delay a subject announcement in which you indicate the scenario you are choosing, harangue each of the subjoined six sections delay at meanest one portion each. Write at meanest one portion for each content using the underlined titles for a subheading.

  1. Ethical Dilemma: Briefly depict the intellectual doubt in your own signification, including (a) what in the scenario bring-abouts it intricate to bring-encircling an intellectual decomposition and (b) at meanest two libertys for resolving the scenario, providing a petty overapprehension of what order of intellectual decompositions each liberty dominion bring-about.
  2. Core Beliefs: What beliefs encircling God and rationality from the Christian worldapprehension are applicable to the scenario? How dominion these kernel worldapprehension commitments of Christians wave one's decomposition-making delay deem to this scenario?
  3. Resolution: Depict the Christian worldview's suggestion for resolving the intellectual doubt. How should the idiosyncratic in the scenario act according to the Christian worldview? What is the best career of action for a Christian? (Note: The decomposition should be congruous delay Christian worldapprehension commitments.)
  4. Evaluation: What dominion be the unplanned consequences and perceived benefits of the decomposition proposed by the Christian worldview?
  5. Comparison: How does the Christian worldapprehension decomposition parallel to how another worldapprehension dominion contravene the doubt? Choose a peculiar contrasting worldview, such as formalism, tritheism, or scientism.
  6. Conclusion: Synthesize the main points, pulling the ideas of the tract unitedly.
  7. References