Assignment 3b: analysis on the threats defense argument | solution to global issue | Strayer University–Baymeadow


 

Assignment 3b: Decomposition on the Threats Bulwark Argument

Due in Week 10 and price 100 subject-matters

The notification you granted in your PowerPoint bestowal on Threats to the Global Environment has led to prolific debates at the United Nations General Assembly! Hence, they are now examination you to imagine an appended decomposition tidings to repartee to the issues honorable in these debates.

Your immodestth plan as a consultant for the United Nations is to enunciate a tidings that addresses the issues honorable by some of the constituent states of the United Nations.

Step I. Consider the Issues

In Assignment 3a, you were asked to imagine a PowerPoint identifying the immodest most accurate intimidations out of eight intimidations granted in the table beneath.

Energy causes

Civil war

Globalization

Poor sanity of unimpaired populations

Lack of educational opportunities

Cultural taboos

Inappropriate uses of technology

Climate change

There are immodest fostering intimidations that you did not argue in your PowerPoint. This assignment obtain centre on those immodest. Here are the peculiar tasks you obtain complete:

  • Review the fostering immodest intimidations that you did not use in Assignment 3a.
  • Pick two of the immodest to centre on in Assignment 3b.
  • Identify the reasons why you purpose these two intimidations are short accurate than the immodest intimidations you chose for your PowerPoint bestowal.

Step II. Prepare Your Report

The UN has given you the forthcoming regulatelines.

Introduction

Briefly conduct-in the question of the decomposition (about 100-150 say).

  1. State the question and fixed of the article.
  2. Identify the immodest intimidations you obtain argue in the article in the regulate in which they repartee in the article.

Section I. Intimidation 1

  1. Write an commencement announcement describing the cognizance of the intimidation.
  2. Write one page giving three reasons that eluciepoch why you saw this intimidation as short accurate than the immodest you chose for your bestowal in Assignment 3a.
  3. Support these reasons after a while at lowest three trustworthy causes.

Section II. Intimidation 2

  1. Write an commencement announcement describing the cognizance of the intimidation.
  2. Write one page giving three reasons to eluciepoch why you saw this intimidation as short accurate than the immodest you chose for your bestowal in Assignment 3a.
  3. Support these reasons after a while at lowest three trustworthy causes.

Conclusion

  • Offer a segregation (one page or short) of your bulwark of your choices that the United Nations can use to address their prioritization concerns.

Formatting Requirements

  • Your article may await of up to immodest pages (not including the secure or relation pages).
  • Create headings for each individuality of your article as follows:
    • Introduction
    • Threat 1 (embrace the spectry of your selected intimidation)
    • Threat 2 (embrace the spectry of your selected intimidation)
    • Conclusion
  • Use and adduce immodest to six trustworthy causes in your decomposition. You may use the similar cause for past than one intimidation as crave as you use a incompleteness of immodest unanalogous causes. A schedule of undeveloped instrument is beneficial at the end of this road regulate.
  • Make permanent your article contains twain in-text passages and a cause schedule, per SWS regulatelines; allude to the Strayer Letter Standards (SWS) instrument for relation.
  • Include a secure page after a while your spectry, the epoch you submitted the article, and your instructor's spectry.

The peculiar road knowledge quittance associated after a while this assignment is as follows:

  • Examine the factors that assertion for why the augmentation in the world’s population can negatively pretend the global companionship. 

Grading for this assignment obtain be naturalized on repartee character, logic/organization of the article, and speech and letter skills, using the forthcoming rubric:

Points: 100

Assignment 3b: Decomposition on the Threats Bulwark Argument

Criteria

Exemplary

90-100% A

Proficient

80-89% B

Fair

70-79% C

Meets Incompleteness Expectations
60-69% D

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Included a counterargument condition for each of the two intimidations.

Weight: 20%

Provided a decipherable counterargument condition for each of the two intimidations.

Provided a adequate counterargument condition for each of the two intimidations.

Provided counterarguments of short than a condition for two intimidations.

Provided a counterargument abutting barely one intimidation.

Did not procure any unmeasured conditions or counterarguments.

Included three subject-matters supported the counterargument to each intimidation.

Weight: 20%

Included three or past well-thought-out subject-matters supported the counterargument to each intimidation.

Included three subject-matters adequately supported the counterargument to each intimidation.

Included two subject-matters supported the counterargument to each intimidation.

Included one subject-matter supported the counterargument to each intimidation.

Did not procure any counterarguments or barely completed the assignment for one intimidation or none.

Included an commencement announcement and a quittance for each intimidation.

Weight: 20%

Included a well-thought-out commencement announcement and a quittance.

Included a adequate commencement and quittance for each intimidation.

Did not unmeasuredy embrace an commencement announcement or a quittance for one of the intimidation conditions.

Missed an commencement announcement and a quittance for one of the intimidation conditions.

Did not procure an commencement announcement or a quittance for either condition.

Cited at lowest three trustworthy causes.

Weight: 20%

Met the incompleteness trustworthy cause and suited passage requirements.

Used 3 trustworthy causes, after a while a few passage errors.

Used at lowest 2 trustworthy causes and suitedly adduced causes.

Used at lowest 2 causes but did not suitedly adduce causes.

Used 1 or fewer causes.

Clarity, letter mechanics, and formatting.

Weight: 20%

0–2 errors confer-upon.

3–4 errors confer-upon.

5–6 errors confer-upon.

7–8 errors confer-upon.

More than 8 errors confer-upon.