Assignment 2: analysis on food security | Solutions to global issues


 

Assignment 2: Decomposition on Livelihood Security

Due Week 7 and desert 110 points

The portions of the United Nations establish grand prize in the decomposition you supposing on the effects of global warming that omission from population enlargement. They are now interrogation you transcribe an affixed decomposition to embrace prefer results allied to population enlargement. Here is the result they bear asked you to consider:

The portion states of the United Nations affect to raise livelihood systems that can supply global livelihood ease which conquer recbalance entireone, entirewhere, entire day by befitting livelihood disposition though the advancement of able and nutritional urban performances. The probing result is not the bankruptcy of livelihood in the globe but the entrance to that livelihood. In divers enucleateing countries, livelihood shortages are due to governmental repress balance livelihood division. These governments restrain repress of the population and their rule by limiting entrance to salubrious livelihood to unmistakable groups. In this performance, they thereby "weaponize" livelihood.

Your cooperate purpose as a consultant for the United Nations is to enucleate an decomposition that discoursees three results allied to global livelihood inease caused by global population enlargement and need, and to perpend these results in a enucleateing empire of your choosing.

The UN has dedicated you the aftercited guidelines.

Content

The UN has asked that your monograph embrace three minoritys. Each minority should be one page (or closely 300 say) in diffusiveness and rejoinder restricted interrogations, attested in the pur-pose under. It besides asks that you use examples from your enucleateing empire when rejoindering the interrogations.

Introduction

Provide an preface of half a page restriction that discoursees points a-e under.

  1. Explains the drift the UN has asked you to dispur-pose in your own say;
  2. Identifies the three minoritys your monograph conquer secure;
  3. Identifies the enucleateing empire you conquer consider;
  4. Tells the UN the causes of livelihood disgrace; and
  5. Provides a one-sentence declaration of your solutions at the end of your preface portion.

Section I. Background

  1. What is livelihood disgrace?
  2. What role does population enlargement portray in livelihood ease?

Section II. Technologies That Can Subjugate Long and Mend Livelihood Security

  1. What forms of technology can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease?
  2. How would these technological solutions operation?
  3. What causes of livelihood inease do these technologies discourse?

Section III. Restricted Factors in Chosen Developing Country

  1. Considering the causes of livelihood disgrace, what factors break the run of livelihood from the cause to the mob in the enucleateing empire you clarified?

            Conclusion

  • Provide a omission of half a page restriction that embraces a epitome of your perceiveings that the United Nations can use to instruct coming system decisions.

Success Tips

  • In rejoindering each interrogation, use examples from your enucleateing empire to teach your points.
  • The UN needs axioms and concrete decomposition on which to infamous coming system decisions; shun special impression and establish firm your rejoinders are infamousd on instructation you perceive through investigation.

Formatting Requirements

  • Make firm your monograph consists of four to six pages of gaining (or 1,200 say restriction, not including the cbalance or regard pages).
  • Create headings for each minority of your monograph as follows:
    • Section I. Background
    • Section II. Technologies That Can Subjugate Long and Mend Livelihood Security
    • Section III. Specific Factors in Chosen Developing Country
  • Use and call at meanest five likely causes in your investigation. A inventory of immanent resources is beneficial under.
  • Make firm your monograph embraces twain in-text passages and a cause inventory, per SWS guidelines: Refer to the Strayer Agreement Standards (SWS) instrument for regard.
  • Include a cbalance page delay your designate, the empire you clarified, the date you submitted the monograph, and your instructor’s designate.

Potential Sources

  1. Peter Timmer. May/June 2015. Livelihood Ease and Scarcity: Why Ending Long Is So Hard. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/food-security-and-scarcity-why-ending-hunger-so-hard
  2. The United Nations Population Division. 2017. Globe Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html
  3. Will Martin. November 5, 2010. Livelihood Ease and Poverty: A Precarious Balance. Let's Talk Development blog by The Globe Bank. http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/food-security-and-poverty-a-precarious-balance

The restricted pur-pose acquirements outcome associated delay this assignment is as follows:

  • Propose a pur-pose to dispur-pose the result of global livelihood ease in underdeveloped countries that considers the impression of earlier solutions.

Grading for this assignment conquer be infamousd on rejoinder disposition, logic/organization of the monograph, and vernacular and agreement skills, using the aftercited rubric:

Points: 110

Assignment 2: Decomposition on Livelihood Security

Criteria

Exemplary

90–100% A

Proficient

80–89% B

Fair

70–79% C

Meets Restriction Expectations
60–69% D

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Defined livelihood inease and discourseed its association to population enlargement.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in teaching the association among livelihood inease and population enlargement.

Proficiently teached the association among livelihood inease and population enlargement.

Defined livelihood inease and population enlargement but did not enoughly teach the association among the two.

Defined livelihood inease and population enlargement but did not teach the association among the two.

Did not eliminate or conjoin livelihood inease or population enlargement.

Explained other results that are legitimate for livelihood inease in a restricted enucleateing empire.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in teaching results that are legitimate for livelihood inease in a restricted enucleateing empire.

Proficiently teached results that are legitimate for livelihood inease in a restricted enucleateing empire.

Explained results that are legitimate for livelihood inease but did not report them to a restricted enucleateing empire.

Defined results that are legitimate for livelihood inease but did not report them to a restricted enucleateing empire.

Did not teach results allied to livelihood inease as it reports to a restricted enucleateing empire.

Explained the forms of technology that can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in teaching how technology can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease.

Proficiently teached how technology can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease.

Explained how technology can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease.

Listed forms of technology that can be used to subjugate long and mend livelihood ease but did not teach how they can do so.

Did not inventory or teach how forms of technology can be used to subjugate long or mend livelihood ease.

Included an beginning portion and a omission for this minority of the monograph.

Weight: 20%

Included a well-thought-out beginning declaration and a omission.

Included a enough beginning and a omission.

Did not enoughly embrace either an beginning declaration or a omission.

Missed agreement either an beginning declaration or a omission.

Both the beginning portion and omission are missing.

Clarity, agreement mechanics, and formatting.

Weight: 15%

0-2 errors confer-upon.

3-4 errors confer-upon.

5-6 errors confer-upon.

7-8 errors confer-upon.

More than 8 errors confer-upon.

Met the restriction capacity of five likely causes/citations.

Weight: 5%

Met restriction likely cause and own passage capacity.

Used 4 likely causes, delay few passage errors.

Used at meanest 3 likely causes and ownly calld causes.

Used at meanest 2 causes but did not ownly call causes.

Used 1 or fewer causes.