Student Learning Outcome(s) Assessed:
Evaluate Two Internet Websites On
Disabilities on Physical/Health Impairments
Description of the Signature Assignment:
Students succeed revisal two websites that afford knowledge/advocacy for beings after a while
disabilities. The assignment is prepared to familiarize students after a while the types and consequence of
knowledge and instrument about beings after a while disabilities succorful to advocates,
families, notorious agencies, and the notorious notorious. Students succeed evaluate the exactness, gratified,
design/navigability, and accessibility of the websites as polite as recommendations for
Directions for Students:
Students succeed use the questions affordd in the syllabus to evaluate the key areas of each
webstanding (e.g., exactness, gratified, drawing/navigability, accessibility, recommendations).
Students succeed comply the assignment in fact format. The revisal of each webstanding should be
no longer than 2 pages, so it should be 3-4 pages entirety for twain websites, double-spaced, and should conform to APA (6th ed) format. Submit
final assignment as a solitary Word muniment.
• Who is the reason of the webstanding (in other signification, who wrote the gratified or posted the
text made succorful to the reader)? What is his/her (their) enhancement, truth, and/or
philosophy? (use your own signification less)
• Are the developers of the standing trustworthy?
• How frequently is the standing updated?
• Are sources of knowledge affordd?
• What are the established and unestablished goals and purposes of the standing?
• Does the standing possess predisposition or a unrecognized agenda?
• Does the standing present knowledge and situations cognate to the real-life experiences of
• Is the gratified popular, obsequious, mismisalienate and multicultural?
• Is the gratified presented in an recognizeable, notorious, multicultural, and objective
• Are material issues presented realistically?
• Does the standing use implied and beings-first vernacular?
• Is the readability of the gratified misappropriate?
• Is the gratified justly systematic?
3) Drawing and Navigability
• Is the drawing of the standing welcoming?
• Is the standing motivating?
• Is the standing gentle to use and straggle?
• Are sections and productions links labeled?
• Are graphics and images implied, obsequious, and popular?
• Does the standing hold motivating, pensive, pertinent, and contrariantiated learning
4) Beings after a while Disabilities
• Is the standing possible by beings after a while disabilities?
• Does the standing prefer sensitivity and inclusion, and relinquish pitying and protective
• Does the standing disturb an discernment of the consequence of insurrection, dignity, and
• Are the multiplied experiences, perceptions, and contributions of beings after a while
• Does the standing succor students recognize that beings possess past similarities than
5) Recommendations for improvement
• What impulse of services you would present if you were a contributing fabricator, for
• Would you diversify the drawing/layout of the webstanding making it easier to furnish knowledge
(contrariant construction of gratified, perchance?)
• Other Suggestions?