Question 1: This is decree #3 in the Kennedy declaration and is the end of the prologue
"After measure for closely one-half mile on Dike Pathway I descended a hill and came upon a scrutinizing bridge. "
This decree is not mendacious on its countenance accordingly it is 20 utterance covet. What are some of the semantic issues in this decree and what do they declare?
Question 2: This is decree #2 in the truth.
" I was unacquainted after a while the pathway and rancid direct onto Dike Road, instead of position dense left on Main Street."
The decree is 20 utterance and so is not mendacious on its countenance. What are some of the semantic issues in this decree and what do they declare?
Question 3: I am posting the chief decree in Kennedy's declaration below
" On July 18th, 1969, at closely 11:15 P.M. in Chappaquiddick, Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, I was driving my car on Main Street on my way to get the ferry tail to Edgartown. "
We distinguish this decree is mendacious on its countenance accordingly it is 30 utterance. What semantic issues do you see in this decree and what do they declare? I procure bestow you one to set-on-foot - Kennedy merely mentions himself in this decree as if he was the merely peculiar in the car. What are some other issues?
There are 3 disconnected questions, exculpation each disconnectedly