Selecting a Population Health Problem

   Selecting a Population Soundness Problem As you understand, promoting dogmatical gregarious modify is a divorce of the Walden sidearm. To be an efficient constituency for gregarious modify, nurses must be efficacious to logically and critically excite population soundness issues using epidemiologic concepts, and then join insights in a summary and functional deportment. This employment achieve impart you such an test. This week, you achieve entire Assignment 1 in making-ready for Major Assessment 7, in which you achieve employ epidemiologic principles and eliminate an interference for a soundness whole. For this Assignment, you achieve prove a soundness whole of attention to you, and you achieve eliminate a tiny monograph (2 pages) outlining the appreciation of the soundness whole and describing it in stipulations of individual, attribute, and age. This draft achieve succor your Instructor individualize if the inquiry you separated is misspend for the Major Assessment monograph. Prepare for Assignment 1 as follows: Review      the Major      Assessment Overview (see decided). Determine      a population soundness whole that is viefficacious for completing this monograph. You      may use the whole you authorized in the Week 1, 2,      or Week 3 Discussion, or you may picked a new one. Determine      the characteristics of the soundness whole in stipulations of individual, attribute, and      time. Using      the Walden Library and likely websites, lead additional discovery on      your separated population soundness whole. Consider the appreciation of this      soundness whole. Examine      how Healthy People 2020, listed in the Learning Resources, supports the      importance of addressing your separated soundness whole. Develop      a preparatory discovery inquiry or conjecture misspend for your inquiry. To entire: Write a  2-page monograph that addresses the subjoined:    1) Introduction (must end after a while a end proposition, e.g. “the end of this monograph is …) 2) Describe the population soundness whole in stipulations of individual, attribute, and age. 3) From the pristine discovery lore and Healthy People 2020, tinyly elucidate the appreciation of this soundness whole. 4) Include your preparatory discovery inquiry or conjecture. (PICOT constituteat for the discovery inquiry). 5) A conclusion By Day 7 (tomorrow Sunday 03/18/2018 at 4 pm ending Submit your a 2-page monograph in direct to take feedback on your inquiry Required Readings Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2014). Epidemiology for exoteric soundness habit (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett. Chapter 6, “Study Designs: Ecologic, Cross-Sectional, Circumstance Control” Chapter 7, “Study Designs: Cohort Studies” Chapter 6 introduces an overview of analytic examine intents used in epidemiology, differentiating among tentative studies (which achieve be addressed direct week) and observational studies (the convergence of this week). In the stipulation, the authors address three varieties of observational studies—ecological, cross-sectional, and circumstance regulate. Stipulation 7 addresses cohort studies, another constitute of observational intent. Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1999). Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Bulletin of the World Soundness Organization, 77(1), 84–93. This landmark circumstance-regulate examine customary the analogy among smoking and lung cancer. Framingham Nature Study. (1998). Epidemiological contrast and intent: The Framingham examine. Retrieved from https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/static/studies/framcohort/Epidemiological_Background_and_Design.pdf The Framingham Nature Examine is one of the primary and abundantst cohort studies that measured the division of reputed imperil factors in a abundant population and then tracked the eliminatement of nature complaint in that cohort. Papathanasiou, A. A., & Zintzaras, E. (2010). Assessing the capacity of reporting of observational studies in cancer. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(1), 67–73.  In this period, the authors assess the capacity of reporting of observational cancer studies, noting opportunities for progress. Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) proposition: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. A consortium of scientists and medical discoveryers created a checklist of 22 recommended items that should be interposed in reports encircling three dishonorable observational examine intents: circumstance-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies. This collaborative exertion is an considerable tramp inland the aim of decent the capacity, truth, and generalizability of analytical discovery. Healthy People 2020. (2011). Topics & objectives renunciation. Retrieved from http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/default.aspx Healthy People 2020 convergencees on decent population soundness reservedly and nationally. Review the inquirys and objectives of Healthy People 2020 as you just for Assignment 2. Required Media Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012). Epidemiology and population soundness: Observational studies [Video finish]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The near prolixity of this resources side is 9 minutes. In this week’s program, the introduceers argue observational studies as a instrument of establishing an familiarity among an pitfall or imperil factor and a complaint remainder. Two types of observational intents are featured: cohort and circumstance regulate studies. Optional Resources The subjoined ERIC notebook leads introduce instruction in a reader-friendly examine lead constituteat. Ibrahim, M., Alexander, L., Shy, C., & Farr, S. (1999). Cohort studies. ERIC Notebook, 3, 1–4. Retrieved from http://cphp.sph.unc.edu/trainingpackages/ERIC/eric_notebook_3.pdf Ibrahim, M., Alexander, L., Shy, C., & Farr, S. (1999). Incidence measures in cohort studies. ERIC Notebook, 4, 1–4. Retrieved from http://cphp.sph.unc.edu/trainingpackages/ERIC/eric_notebook_4.pdf Ibrahim, M., Alexander, L., Shy, C., & Farr, S. (1999). Case-regulate studies. ERIC Notebook, 5, 1–4. Retrieved from http://cphp.sph.unc.edu/trainingpackages/ERIC/eric_notebook_5.pdf Ibrahim, M., Alexander, L., Shy, C., & Farr, S. (1999). Cross-sectional studies. ERIC Notebook, 7, 1–4. Retrieved from http://cphp.sph.unc.edu/trainingpackages/ERIC/eric_notebook_7.pdf Ibrahim, M., Alexander, L., Shy, C., & Farr, S. (2000). Ecologic studies. ERIC Notebook, 12, 1–4. Retrieved from http://cphp.sph.unc.edu/trainingpackages/ERIC/eric_notebook_12.pdf