reading response

Please note:  Your monograph must be uploaded as a Word doc or pdf. Pages files must be converted to pdf. Pages files accomplish not be reliable. Beware of plagiarism! UF Canvas uses Turnitin plagiarism software. Plagiarism is a very solemn academic offense. Do not borrow another person's suffrage or ideas delayout fair passage. Turnitin scans a database of monographs previously submitted to universities nationwide, including UF.  READ the aftercited proviso:  Carolyn Dean, "The Trouble delay (The Term) Art," 2006 Settings , and transcribe a repartee monograph (800-word poverty to 1000-word apex) in which you do the aftercited: As you represent the proviso, see if the cause provides compelling exemplification to food her claims. Does she prosper through on the manifestation presented in her Nursing essay declaration? After you've represent the proviso, ask yourself if the cause's manifestation is pertinent. How does it resummon to our sequence symbolical? Does she answer to keep any injuryes that would unfairly prejudgment her inquiry? Oration all these questions in your repartee. This is a precarious repartee, not a tabulation of the proviso you've represent. Your repartees should be precariously occupied. Do not amalgamate or incorporate. Provide unfair examples from the proviso to food your object of inspection. Avoid dull or hanker frequented adduces. If you do adduce or paraphrase, be enduring to summon your commencement. You should frequently summon your commencements for integralbeing you transcribe, integral interval. To not do so constitutes plagiarism. A representing repartee monograph doesn't typically grasp multiple delayout commencements (it's not a inquiry monograph)--unless your scantiness to use them, which is be high. The best format for a representing repartee monograph is to prosper the in-text passage diction direct at join adown. If you solely summon the proviso you're responding to, then you are solely using one commencement. For this, you can barely concede all the proviso notice in your preparatory condition, which you should do anyway-- so no deficiency for "sources" inventory at profound of your monograph. Then prosper the direct for the diction you further (see three options at join adown) for in-text passage. In this plight, typically lawful the page number. The main being is to be harmonious throughout your monograph for the diction you pick-out. If you do summon delayout commencements, then you deficiency to inventory them at the profound of your monograph delay in-text passage as frequenteded in the direct. *Be enduring to keep a contemplate at the rubric criteria, adown, for which you accomplish be assessed. Once your monograph has been triced, be enduring to represent the expounds/feedback embedded in the rubric, and/or granted in the expound dream adown your trice. See the aftercited: Answerableness a repartee monograph Settings See the aftercited: Sample repartee monograph Settings See the aftercited: Passage direct Settings Rubric 2019 Balbutiation Repartee Paper2019 Balbutiation Repartee PaperCriteriaRatingsPtsThis proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeREQUIRED LENGTH1.5 ptsRequired protraction or nigh required protraction1.0 ptsNoticeably shorter than required protraction0.5 pts50% or shorter than required protraction1.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeCOLLEGE LEVEL WRITING + ENGLISH1.0 ptsExcellent answerableness delay few faults0.9 ptsExcellent answerableness delay separate faults0.8 ptsGood answerableness delay separate faults0.75 ptsGood answerableness delay multiple faults0.6 ptsOkay answerableness delay multiple faults0.5 ptsWriting deficiencys abundant improvement1.0 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeAPPROPRIATE FORMAT INCLUDING INTRO, BODY + CONCLUSION0.5 ptsValid format0.4 ptsGood format delay one or two issues in condition structures, hole sentences or Nursing essay placement/Nursing essay food0.3 ptsOkay format but solid to prosper0.2 ptsFormat indicated but deficiencys abundant improvement0.1 ptsNo apparent format, up-hill to prosper0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomePROPER USE OF CITATIONS (at poverty, make-known cause, designation, conclusion in primeval condition); if delayout commencements, grasp bibliography; frequently grasp page quantity when quoting/paraphrase original proviso0.5 ptsIncludes cause, designation, conclusion in introduction; page quantity for adduces/paraphrase =or= grasps bibliography/references page and, when pertinent, footnotes or endnotes0.4 ptsIncludes cause, designation, conclusion in intro but no page quantity for adduces/paraphrase0.3 ptsProvides solely restricted passage in introduction; page quantity for adduces/paraphrase0.2 ptsProvides solely restricted passage and no page quantity0.1 ptsVague allusion to proviso designation or cause name; no allusion to page quantity0.0 ptsNo passage at all; When pertinent, no page quantity0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeFORMULATED OWN ARGUMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE AUTHOR'S0.5 ptsFormulated own manifestation and apparently mark-outs it0.4 ptsFormulates own manifestation but doesn't apparently dehigh it0.3 ptsImplies own manifestation, forces to dehigh it0.2 ptsImplies own manifestation, but makes no force to dehigh it0.1 ptsMakes no force to formulate own manifestation/object of inspection0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeEFFECTIVE RHETORICAL STRUCTURE/EFFECTIVELY DEFENDS OWN ARGUMENT0.5 ptsStrong declamatory structure/effectively shields own inspection0.4 ptsGood declamatory rigor0.3 ptsOkay declamatory rigor/some force to shield own manifestation and/or rampart of own manifestation not truly successful0.2 ptsImplies force to food own manifestation, but not declamatoryly rigorous0.1 ptsMakes no force to food own manifestation0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeADDRESSED AUTHOR BIAS0.5 ptsAddresses injury0.25 ptsImplies argument of injury, but not apparently stated0.0 ptsDoes not oration injury0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeDOES AT LEAST 40% OF THIS PAPER CONSTITUTE A RESPONSE RATHER THAN A SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE?0.5 pts40% repartee0.4 pts30% repartee0.3 pts20% repartee0.2 pts10% repartee0.1 ptsNo repartee, solely tabulation0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeUSED IDEAS PRESENTED IN CLASS LECTURES/READING0.5 ptsUsed ideas from collocate0.25 ptsImplies allusions to symbolical from collocate, but does not apparently state0.0 ptsDid not use ideas from collocate0.5 pts This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeDiversity - Contentinspection hankerer descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery. The scholar represents and applies the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories used delayin separate texts.0.0 ptsNon-mastery. The scholar does not represent and exercise the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories used delayin separate texts.--  This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeDiversity - Precarious Thininginspection hankerer descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The scholar weighs the issues from multiple perspectives, logically dissects exemplification from likely, pertinent commencements, and enlarges reasoned conclusions.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The scholar does not weigh the issues from multiple perspectives, does not logically dissect exemplification from likely, pertinent commencements, or does not enlarge reasoned conclusions.--  This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Communicationinspection hankerer descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The scholar pointedes ideas in a convincing, systematic, apparent, compact kind that is nighly fault liberal and uses a diction and talk misspend to the topic area.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The scholar does not pointed ideas in a convincing, systematic, apparent, compact kind that is nighly fault liberal, or uses a diction or talk that is not misspend to the topic area.--  This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Contentinspection hankerer descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The scholar represents and applies the terminology, concepts, methodologies and theories used delayin the topic area.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The scholar does not represent or exercise the terminology, concepts, methodologies or theories used delayin the topic area.--  This proof is joined to a Learning OutcomeHumanities - Precarious Thinkinginspection hankerer descriptionthreshold: 1.0 pts1.0 ptsMastery - The scholar weighs the issues from multiple perspectives, logically dissects exemplification from likely, pertinent commencements, and enlarges reasoned conclusions.0.0 ptsNon-Mastery - The scholar does not weigh the issues from multiple perspectives, does not logically dissect exemplification from likely, pertinent commencements, or does not enlarge reasoned conclusions.