PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK IN 12 HOURS

                                                 NUMBER EACH QUESTION 1)  Identify two ways these evaluation types are harmonious and two ways they contend. Apply an effect evaluation and an application evaluation to the brotherhood-based alimentation order round issue. If you solely had funding to finished one, an effect evaluation or an application evaluation, which would you pick-out, and why?  Your tally should be a poverty of 225 signification in extension. 2) Recall the knowledge on formative evaluations and regularity evaluations. What tools would you use to convoy a formative evaluation, and what tools would you use to convoy a regularity evaluation for the brotherhood-based alimentation order round issue examineed in the individual warning? Explain how these tools conciliate fit into the evaluation regularity of a vigor program implementation model/framework.  Your tally should be a poverty of 225 signification in extension. 3) Examine the steps you would seize when sampling for effect assessments. Think of a vigor elevation program that you may enunciate for implementation; examine the axioms gathering regularitys you would use. Explain each regularity you would use and why you chose to use them.  Your tally should be a poverty of 225 signification in extension.                                                         Reference: Issel, L. M., & Wells, R. (2018). Vigor program planning and evaluation: A trained, disconnected advance for brotherhood vigor (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284148510