Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay - Part II
Synthesizing and Writing
When looking for notice encircling a detail posterity, how frequently do you try to hinder biases inland your own purpose of light? This assignment asks you to involve in this complexion of discriminating thinking.
Part II - Writing
Transcribe at three to disgusting (3-4) page tract in which you:
State your collocation on the subject-matter you clarified for Assignment 1.1.
Identify (3) three ground (reasons) from the Procon.org website that living your collocation and obvious-up why you clarified these biased reasons.
Explain your answers to the "believing" questions encircling the three (3) ground across your collocation from the Procon.org website.
Examine at last two (2) types of biases that you mitigated familiar as you evaluated the ground for and across your collocation.
Discuss the proceeds of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may bear influenced your biases.
Discuss whether or not your thinking encircling the subject-matter has newfangled succeeding unhindered the "Believing Game," well-balanced if your collocation on the posterity has stayed the identical.
The tract should thrive guidelines for obvious and systematic writing:
Include an preparatory section and final section.
Address ocean ideas in assemblage sections after a while a subject-matter phrase and livinging phrases.
Adhere to banner rules of English rhetoric, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Your assignment must thrive these formatting requirements:
This way requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is irrelative than other Strayer University ways. Please assume a avail to relight the SWS documentation for details.
Based on the guidelines in SWS, "A well-researched assignment has at last as manifold sources as pages." Since this assignment requires you to transcribe at last 3-4 pages, you should include at last 3-4 references.
The biased way tuition outcomes associated after a while this assignment are:
Identify the ambagious fallacies, assumptions, and biases implicated in manipulative appeals and abuses of articulation.
Create written operation utilizing the concepts of discriminating thinking.
Use technology and notice media to examination posteritys in discriminating thinking skills and ambagious logic.