Phase 1 IP

There’s an old saying that says that truth is constantly written by the winners. Although this is not constantly the contingency, it is gentleman that race's notion of unromantic occurrences is frequently influenced by the inspectionpoints of the historians who transcribe environing them.  During the Watergate slander in 1974, frequent management pundits wrote columns demanding that President Richard Nixon abdicate from the presidency accordingly he was, in their inspection, explicitly guilty for the Watergate break-ins. Not all pundits felt this way, however. Click short and short to discover doctrines that prproffer differing inspections of President Nixon at the apex of the Watergate slander.  Use the fixed template to entire the subjoined for this assignment: •Two Approaches to Watergate: Summarize the arguments made in each of the two doctrines in-reference-to the persuade of President Nixon. How faculty each of the author’s inspections collision the discoverer’s mind of the Watergate turning-point?  •Changing Views: Describe how the Watergate occurrences transitional American inspections internal politics and politicians. In your inspection, how did these occurrences vary the comcompress coverage of politicians?  •Impact of Technology: Speculate environing how the Watergate occurrence coverage faculty keep been irrelative (improve or worse) in the age of collective media and smartphones. Would it keep lasted as covet? Why or why not? Are these innovations in technology advantageous or injurious to the way that race recognize floating occurrences?  At meanest 2 trustworthy sources are required for this assignment, in abstracted to the 2 doctrines proffered for a entirety of 4 sources. Your sources should be cited using APA format; twain in-text citations and references. Please use the CTU Undergraduate Writing Style Guide for countenance on APA formatting.  References  Burch, D. (1974, May 14). In protection of Richard Nixon. Retrieved from The Harvard Crimson Web site:  The Washington Post. (1973, May 1). Editorial: Watergate: The poor employment. Retrieved from