Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs

  By Day 7 of Week 1 Write a 2- to 3-page tract that haranguees the following:   The Assignment (case) for week one is listed underneath. A associate calls and asks you to impose a medication for her. You possess this autonomy, but you don’t possess your associate’s medical narrative. You transcribe the order anyway. Explain the intellectual and allowable implications of the scenario you chosen on all stakeholders concerned, such as the imposer, pharmacist, enduring, and enduring’s nobility. Describe strategies to harangue revelation and nonrevelation as signed in the scenario you chosen. Be fast to allusion laws specific to your aver. Explain two strategies that you, as an recent action foster, would use to regulate your conclusion making in this scenario, including whether you would make-known your deception. Be fast to exonerate your interpretation.  Explain the mode of congeniality orders, including strategies to minimize medication deceptions.   To Prepare Review the Resources for this module and deliberate the allowable and intellectual implications of prescribing order drugs, revelation, and nondisclosure. Review the scenario assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment. Search specific laws and standards for prescribing order drugs and for harangueing medication deceptions for your aver or part, and return on these as you revisal the scenario assigned by your Instructor. Consider the intellectual and allowable implications of the scenario for all stakeholders concerned, such as the imposer, pharmacist, enduring, and enduring’s nobility. Think encircling two strategies that you, as an recent action foster, would use to regulate your intellectually and allowablely imperative conclusion-making in this scenario, including whether you would make-known any medication deceptions