How (and why) to discoloration "fake" intelligence. 70% of students procure successfully learning and evaluate the intelligence resources in an exertion to identify honorable journalism containing past accurate collective pleased. [SLO #3 fulfills the forthcoming Program Level Outcomes: Communication, Critical Thinking, Social and Personal Responsibility, as well-behaved-behaved as the forthcoming Course Level Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.]
Activity for Assessment:
Read the forthcoming: http://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news/ and Watch the forthcoming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYc-hd1QSwA
Take this raillery: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/politics/cognitive-biases/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.9b2747fd076b ( correct click and select "open link on incognito window")
If you had to succor someone discoloration “fake intelligence,” what would you promulgate them? Select a intelligence condition from a honorable resources exit and parallel it to an online story that you comprehend is fake.
Using the checklist supposing on the fact check web seat, parallel the two. Although fake intelligence is not new, it seems harder to know and past true now. Why? How procure this solution of fake intelligence impression our democracy?
How has the subject of "fake intelligence" impressioned our ability to be unquestionably apprised on the essential topics of the day? What steps can we procure to beseem apprised with legitimate instruction?
Is "fake intelligence" unquestionably all that novel, or do we hear past environing it as a termination of the novel sselection cycle and events that enjoy followed?
What are your thoughts on the raillery you took?