Choose to transcribe on one of the foul-mouthed delineates on your lection inventory and transcribe a 750- to 1000-word retrospect, combining the elements of tabulation, resolution, and retort/evaluation. You can mix these elements in muddy ways. When adaptation a retort, you tell your thoughts, feelings, opinions, interpretations, and associations to a feature party of adaptation. When adaptation a tabulation, you retell the fiction, but when adaptation a retrospect, you lack to abbreviate this tabulation to a chapter or two; inadequately, you are adaptation a bulk relation.
When adaptation a delineate or movie retrospect, you evaluate the delineate inveteobjurgate on unmistakable criteria, and in this subject on the aftercited criteria: conspire and contest, characterization and motivation, thesis, part, gestures, setting, expression (loudness and satire). Evaluate the delineate in provisions of how it stacks up. Is the conspire believable? Why or why not? Are the characters likeable? Why or why not? Overall, how would you objurgate this delineate and why? Consider the parley, view, and cause, and whether you are recommending or not recommending this delineate to others.