DNP: Patient Outcome & Sustainable Change

Please, No Plagiarized Work Topic: Subject Report: Contact of Kind and Security Concepts In this assignment, gleaners are required to transcribe a subject tidings addressing the personal reason and skills gained in this direction and presumptively solving an identified custom quantity. General Guidelines: Use the behindcited counsel to secure fortunate completion of the assignment: · Doctoral gleaners are required to use APA mode for their fitness assignments. · This assignment requires the inclusion of at last three subjoined erudite examination origins kindred to this theme, and at last one in-text citation from each origin. · You are required to yield this assignment to LopesWrite.   Directions: Construct a subject tidings (2,500-3,000 words/approximately 10-12 pages) that apprehends a quantity or seat consonant delay a DNP area of custom. 1. Criticism the AHRQ and the IOM tidings ("To Err Is Human" and "Crossing the Kind Chasm") to educe the subject tidings. 2. Apply kind and/or security concepts to draw the reason of the quantity or seat of nucleus. 3. Apply one or over kind and/or security concepts to the recommended interference or reredisruption nature incomplete. 4. Educe the subject tidings opposing the bountiful scenario from the identification of the clinical or soundness caution quantity through the tender for an interference, implementation, and evaluation using an misapply examination utensil. 5. Draw the evaluation of the selected examination utensil in the subject tidings. 6. Lastly, serene-up in bountiful the declaration, rationale for gathering (experimental sign), and serene contact using the vernacular of kind and/or security delayin the subject tidings. Case Tidings Requirements: In importation, your subject tidings must apprehend the behindcited: 1. Introduction delay a quantity announcement. 2. Brief lore criticism. 3. Title of the subject/situation/stipulations serene-uped from a presumptive perspective. 4. Discussion that apprehends a minute interpretation of the synthesized lore findings. 5. Summary of the subject. 6. Inexhaustive resolutions to specific gaps, inefficiencies, or other issues from a presumptive way. 7. Identification of a facts collation utensil to evaluate the inexhaustive reredisruption along delay a title of how the utensil could be evaluated. 8. Conclusion. You are required to exhaustive your assignment using real-world contact. Real-world contact requires the use of sign-based facts, contemporary theories, and concepts giveed in the direction. The meridian of your assignment must give a viable contact in a ordinary custom setting. For over counsel on parameters for custom immersion hours, content point to the DNP media in the DC Network. Study Materials Read Chapter 6 in Outcome Assessment in Advanced Custom Nursing 4e.  Tucker, C., Arthur, T., & Roncoroni, J. (2013). Patient-centered, culturally impressible soundness caution. American Journal of Lifemode Medicine, 9(1), 63-77. doi:10.1177/1559827613498065 Park, Y., & Martin, E. G. (2018). Geographic disparities in advance to nursing abode services: Assessing fiscal urgency and kind of caution. Soundness Services Research, 53, 2932-2951. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12801  Barsell, J., Everhart, R. S., Miadich, S. A., & Trujillo, M. A. (2018). Examining soundness behaviors, soundness literacy, and self-efficacy in propaganda students delay continuous stipulations. American Journal of Soundness Education, 49(5), 305-311.  Nguyen, T. H., Park, H., Han, H-R., Chan, K. S., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Haun, J., & Kim, M. T. (2015). State of the skill of soundness literacy measures: Validity implications for lad populations. Patient Education & Counseling, 98(12), 1492-1512. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.013 Pronovost, P. J., Cleeman, J. I., Wright, D., & Srinivasan, A. (2016). Fifteen years behind To Err is Human: A good-fortune fiction to glean from. BMJ Kind & Safety, 25(6), 396. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004720 Mitchell, I., Schuster, A., Smith, K., Pronovost, P., & Wu, A. (2016). Patient security clear tidingsing: A vital examine of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years behind "To Err is Human." BMJ Kind & Safety, 25(2), 92. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004405 Califf, R. M., Robb, M. A., Bindman, A. B., Briggs, J. P., Collins, F. S., Conway, P. H., & Sherman, R. E. (2016). Transforming sign stock to stay soundness and soundness caution decisions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(24), 2395-2400. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1610128 AHRQ: Agency for Healthcaution Examination and Quality. (n.d.). Soundness literacy mass tools (revised). Explore the National Committee for Kind Assurance website. Institute of Medicine. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer soundness scheme. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the kind chasm: A new soundness scheme for the 21st seniority. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Explore the Patient Centered Medical Home: Reorigin Center page on the Agency for Healthcaution Examination and Kind website. Explore the Primary Caution Collaborative website. Explore the Soundness Literacy page on the National Network of Libraries of Medicine website. Explore the Soundness Literacy Online page on the Office of Disease Prevention and Soundness Promotion website.