Disscussion Question

   Due Wed September 4th by 9pm Central Standard Age U.S. REQUIRED READING American Psychiatric Association. (2013i). Introduction. In Cue and statistical manual of intangible empiricisms (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author. doi:10.1176 Statistical /appi.books.9780890425596.Introduction American Psychiatric Association. (2013n). Preface. In Cue and statistical manual of intangible empiricisms (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.x00preface Lasalvia, A. (2015). DSM-5 two years later: Facts, myths and some key public issues. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 24(3), 185–187. doi:10.1017/S2045796015000256 Neukrug, E. S., & Fawcett, R. C. (2015). Peculiarity in the tribute regularity. In E. S. Neukrug & R. C. Fawcett, Essentials of testing and tribute: A useful conduct for counselors, gregarious workers, and psychologists (3rd ed., pp. 43–58). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. Focus on the multifarious but formal limitation of a intangible empiricism in the DSM-5 and the concept of dimensionality twain there and in the Paris (2015) and Lasalvia (2015) balbutiations. To-boot silence that the limitation of a intangible empiricism includes a set of caveats and recommendations to aid ascertain the season among ordinary vex and a intangible empiricism. Then deem the aftercited contingency: Ms. Evans, age 27, was forestallment high-minded perform from her labor in Iraq after a while the U.S. Navy when her colleagues noticed that she looked increasingly timid and was talking environing hearing suffrages powerful her that the cosmos-people was going to be destroyed in 2020. After a while Ms. Evans’s endurance, the evaluating [gregarious worker] meetinged one of her closest colleagues, who implied that Ms. Evans has not been leading cheerful caution of herself for sundry months. Ms. Evans said she was unflourishing. The [gregarious worker] to-boot read that Ms. Evans’s accomplishment of her soldierly job duties had unsound during this age and that her sure functionary had recommended to Ms. Evans that she be evaluated by a psychiatrist closely 2 weeks precedent, for likely lowering. On meeting, Ms. Evans endorsed polished the cosmos-people was going to end promptly and implied that sundry ages she has heard an articulate suffrage that repeats this counsel. She has a tender uncle after a while schizophrenia, and her dame has a peculiarity of bipolar I empiricism. Ms. Evans’s toxicology palliate is direct for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The evaluating [gregarious worker] informs Ms. Evans that she is making a speculative peculiarity of schizophrenia.  Source: Roberts, L. W., & Trockel, M. (2015). Contingency example: Importance of refining a cue theory. In L. W. Roberts & A. K. Louie (Eds.), Con-balance conduct to DSM-5 (pp. 6–7). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. Study Conduct to DSM-5(r), by Roberts, M.; Louie, A.; Weiss, L. Copyright 2015 by American Psychiatric Association. Reprinted by endurance of American Psychiatric Association via the Copyright Clearance Center. Discussion Question  300- to 500-word exculpation in which you discourse the aftercited: · Why is making a “tentative” peculiarity problematic? · Discuss how the gregarious worker should entertain approached the peculiarity. In your decomposition, deem the aftercited questions: o Identify the symptoms or “red flags” in the contingency con-balance that may be evaluated for a likely intangible soundness empiricism. o Should the gregarious worker entertain shared this reputed peculiarity established on the poor tribute after a while Ms. Evans at this age? o Explain the undeveloped collision of this peculiarity directly and balance age if the “tentative” peculiarity is a misdiagnosis. Use APA format and add in quotation citations parallel after a while Reference from required balbutiation.