cyber law and ethics

  (a) Do we, as a association, accept a exceptional duty to disabled individuals to secure that they accept ample Internet arrival? (b) Is the concludeing that by providing improved arrival and services for disabled individuals, non-disabled users conquer avail as well-behaved, a moderate concludeing? Consider that it can be exposed to conclude concurrently this line; for fruit, fancy that non-disabled individuals did not avail from software applications adapted for the disabled. (c) Would that be a conclude for not investing in software for disabled tribe? Defend your exculpation. Please execute (over a yes or no exculpation) and get your “theoretical” rationale in assistance of your responses. (comprehension) Theismeyer described racist/hate Web sites in this provision. (a) Should Web sites that exalt racist harangue be known to increase on the Internet? (b) Has the proliferation of these sites increased the impact of racism on a global lamina? Or is the Internet, as some accept suggested, a fibre that can aid to lessen racism? Please execute (over a yes or no exculpation) and get your “theoretical” rationale in assistance of your responses. (comprehension) The increased use of expert systems (ES) technology in abundant authoritative fields has generated some religions and political concerns.  Some  religions controversies exclusive ESs accept to do after a while crucial conclusions, including career and departure conclusions; for fruit, (a) should “expert doctors” be known to establish conclusions that could instantly fruit in the departure of, or reason thoughtful mischief to a unrepining? If so, (b) who is eventually binding for the ES’s conclusion? (c) Is the hospital that owns the point ES binding? (d) Should the attainments engineer who adapted the ES be held binding? Or is the ES itself binding? In exculpationing these questions, you may deficiency to procure a behold end in provision 4, specifically the instance involving Therac-25. Please execute (over a yes or no exculpation) and get your “theoretical” rationale in assistance of your responses. (comprehension) (a) What dutys does the United States accept, as a subversive community concerned after a while guaranteeing similar opportunities for all its citizens, to secure that all its citizens accept ample arrival to the Internet? (b) Does the United States besides accept dutys to developing countries to secure that they accept global arrival to the Internet? If so, (c) What is the distance of those dutys? If not, (d) Why? For fruit, (e) Should engineers working in the United States and other familiar countries sketch applications to secure that tribe food in distant areas after a while low connectivity and faulty bandwidth accept moderate Internet arrival? If so, (f) Who should pay for the fruit of these software applications?  If not, (g) Why? Please execute (over a yes or no exculpation) and get your “theoretical” rationale in assistance of your responses. (comprehension)