Part of your function as a scholar-practitioner is to act as a censorious after a whileerr of lore and ask apprised questions of published representative. Sometimes, claims are made that do not equality the results of the decomposition. Unfortunately, this is why statistics is sometimes unfairly associated delay powerful lies. These misalignments potentiality not be merely imputable to statistical folly, but too “user fault.” One of the principal areas of user fault is delayin the custom of fancy testing and interpreting statistical notion. As you remain to after a whileer lore, be assured and learn anything delay a censorious eye and overcome out statements that do not equality the results.
For this Assignment, you succeed scrutinize statistical notion and meaningfulness naturalized on scantling statements.
To adapt for this Assignment:
Review the Week 5 Scenarios ground in this week’s Learning Resources and choice two of the impure scenarios for this Assignment.
For this Assignment:
Critically evaluate the two scenarios you choiceed naturalized upon the forthcoming points:
Critically evaluate the scantling dimension.
Critically evaluate the statements for meaningfulness.
Critically evaluate the statements for statistical notion.
Based on your evaluation, collect an exposition of the implications for political exchange.
Use decent APA format and citations, and referencing.