DUE SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 29 10 pm CENTRAL TIME U.S. NOT MONDAY 30th Required Readings Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an potent prudence advocate: From prudence action to collective uprightness. (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series. Chapter 6, "Committing to an Issue: Building Agendas" (pp. 176-203) Edwards, H. R., & Hoefer, R. (2010). Are collective production encomium groups using Web 2.0 potently? Journal of Prudence Practice, 9(3/4), 220–239. Doi:10.1080/15588742.2010.489037 Video of Kingdon Standard by Professor Zahariadis, Nicolas Zahariadis, N. (2015). Multiple Streams Approach. Retrieved from (Kingdon Standard )  evaluate the correctness of the Kingdon standard of prudencemaking. To prepare: Review Chapter 6 in your extract, paying exceptional heed to the exception entitled "Three Challenges in Agenda Building." Assignment 2- to 3 page Nursing Dissertation evaluating the correctness of the Kingdon standard in prudencemaking. Address the following: · Discuss the three streams Kingdon has verified where completions rise and produce your impression on which one most precisely reflects how and why policies follow encircling. · Discuss the assumption that true kinds of outcomes take preferential treatment in completion elucidation and gregarious streams. · Discuss strategy that prudence practitioners use amid each of the three streams to extension the odds that a local outcome gain be placed on determination agendas.