How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?
Source A is a lot of quotation written by Haig honorcogent antecedently the conflict of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haig's judgment the authenticm has to recognize the losses of engagement. He admires that notwithstanding polite-mannered-mannered an soldiery is expertnessed and led they conquer feel to submit-to immolations. This is penny but not to the space of the Somme where the allies fantastical past a huge 620,000 men.
Haig wrote this elicit a month antecedently the chief assault suggesting that he knew there was going to be a bulky total casualties. This as-polite implies that he hadn't made plenteous of an trial to exexchange the management and snatch the lives of men but lazily chose to furnish the authenticm of inert losses. In this elicit, a intractcogent verge of Haig has been unleashed delay his inclicommunity concentrating solely on the conquest of the conflict, no substance what the costs. For in Haig states " a authenticm must be taught to submit-to losses" and "no of expertness conquer qualify total of victories to be won, delayout the immolation of men's lives" giving us the percussion that his determirealm for conquest would plug at dot.
Before arriving at a falsification to this inquiry, we must deem Haig's enhancement as polite-mannered-mannered as his prevailing posture. Sir Douglas Haig had had a crave soldieraffect course contending in divers conflicts and wars including the Boer War where he had served in the Cavalry. During his 40-year course he had past divers comrades and it is affectly that infallible firmness conquer enlarge inverge him and he conquer imbibe to lose encircling the seriousness of exit. We must as-polite recall that Haig is the Public of the Similar Forces, he conquer insufficiency to be portrayed as a firm man skilful to accept firm decisions. We as-polite recognize Haig is a sacred man. Would a sacred man bestow a man to his exit delayout caring?
In the end I apprehend 'care' is too robust a vocable. From the declaration aloft I end that Haig sent men to their exits, accordingly he idiosyncratically and honestly admired himself to be doing the direct object to abound in conquest. Haig did circumspection, but he was an old guise public using old guise regularity to abound in a novel war.
Study Sources B & C:
Which one of these beginnings do you commission balance?
Sources B and C are twain shabby elicits from totalitys of the conflict of the Somme. Haig wrote beginning B on the day antecedently and during the chief assault. He states "the men are in heroic spirits" and we surprise how men could be in such "heroic spirits" when they are foundation lives in a encroach, probably abstinence from encroach floor and sensibility abodesick. This bring-abouts us surprise if Haig has substantially investigateed the men in the face direction, accordingly he conquer conface that the "spirits" of his multitude are not as "splendid" as he feeling. As-polite when Haig states "the barbed wire has never been cut so polite-mannered" we recognize that from Retired George Coppard (Source C) totality that the barbed wire was one of the ocean discusss for such a tall contingency register on the chief day, if anyobject the wire as a development if the cannonade, was "in a worse insnare than antecedently".
Haig's statements are hugely confuteed by Coppard whose pose towards the Generals "who told them that the facearm courage would pulverize such wire to lots" suggests to us that the morale of the men was not as tall as Haig had expected. The specialty as-polite communicates us that the wire was not cut to permit multitude the split through to the German direction. This is ample for us to inquiry the reliability of Beginning B. However, if Beginning B is fictitious, the inquiry must then be asked why would a top British Public bring-encircling such statements. The discusss could be divers, amongst which one could apprehend that Haig could feel been out-of-sorts sensible, for gregarious discusss, or simply to protect morale up twain at abode and on the face.
There are as-polite divers discusss why Beginning B is not accurate; amongst the most material declaration are the divers sign totalitys and the rudimentary deed that the British Soldiery suffered balance than half darling casualties throughout the conflict.
It could be argued that Coppard's confabulation is the trial of one man through out the 15-mile direction of the Somme. However, inasmuch-as Haig would invent exactness and protect his job by mendacious, it is unreasoncogent that Coppard would insufficiency to bedarken the memories of his new-fangled comrades by mendacious encircling the authentic incidents of the Somme. Factually, the declaration maintenances Coppard's contingency. The deeds communicate us that there were balance 55,000 casualties on the chief day. Haig claims it was a prosperous assault" inasmuch-as Coppard describes the "hundreds of dead". The declaration maintenances Coppard when he claims that the wire was not wholly cut inasmuch-as Haig states, "the wire has never been cut so polite-mannered".
Coppard's aim in doing the confabulation was probably to communicate the circumstance and horrors of war and haply to bring-encircling infallible the mistakes of war are never continual. Haig's aim in fitness Beginning B was probably gregarious and to oceantain his posture. So I end that Beginning C is balance real as it relates to the substantiaten deeds.
Study Sources D & E:
These two beginnings are not encircling Haig and the conflict of the Somme. How far do you conform that they feel no use for the follower studying Haig and the conflict of the Somme?
Sources D and E are twain made to entertain the reception. Beginning D is a open TV train of morals in a encroach. However, Beginning E is a lot of antiwar seed-plot and uniform though it has been made to entertain, it shares the selfselfselfsame subject-matter of aspect as the Master of 'Blackadder' (Source D) encircling Field Marshall Haig and his drinks cabal.
I apprehend a follower studying Haig and the Somme would conface Sources D and E of deemcogent use. They twain affectness prevailing ideas of Haig, one at the term of the uniformt and the other 60 years new-fangledr. As a television train, Beginning D would exhibit aspects that the preponderance of the tribe conform delay in command to boost it's ratings. This suggests that the preponderance of tribe conform that Haig was a thin head. The train 'Blackadder goes Forth' affectnesss twain verge of war; morals in the facedirection encroaches and then in the General's headquarters. This conquer present a follower an instinct to the provisions of the encroaches and that of the headquarters.
However, Beginning D was made 60 years following the war so the master must feel made it using beginnings such as E and other haply totalitys.
Source E as-polite affectnesss how men were kitted out and how out-of-sorts luxuriance would feel furnishd them for the authenticity of the war they were encircling to action. This is conducive as it affectnesss how plenteous sentiment they gave to the luxuriance and equipping of his multitude.
I apprehend twain beginnings are pertinent to a follower studying Haig as they affectness the aspect shared by divers tribe, which is frequently material. Beginning E as-polite communicates us that the perfect of the authenticm did not maintenance the war seed-plot and it presents a follower an instinct to Britain during 1914-1918.
Study Sources F,G & H:
Do Sources G and H substantiate that F is crime?
Source F is an elicit from a new-fangled bulk designated "British Butchers and Bunglers of World War". The drift of the style is indecent, chiefly towards Haig. The bulk centres on the prevailing aspect, that Haig was a clumsy old public. The bulk, affect divers written, is naturalized on judgment rather than on deed. Whilst the bulk probably contains statistical declaration, the triumph or demand Haig's conflict temporization is to an space naturalized on judgment. The transcriber has not acceptn into deemation that WW1 was the chief model of war to be fought in encroaches and delay muniment guns. I apprehend it's unjust to chide Haig (who had been expertnessed as a cavalry dignitary) for not having plain a prosperous temporization. The producer has as-polite bygone to hint had Haig not reacted at the Somme, the French would feel been acceptn at Verdun and the German soldiery would feel balancewhelmed the British.
Source G is an elicit from the "German Official History of the Chief World War" which surprisingly confutes Beginning F. Unaffect divers other beginnings, this elicit respects the British for their conquest. Beginning G is communicateing us that the victors of the Somme were presentn a excellent morale boost for the forthcoming. It as-polite meant that the Germans had past all of their triald soldiery, which weakened the German face direction. It seems as though the Germans are praising Haig, unaffect Beginning F. However, this beginning may as-polite be inquiryed presentn that at the term of fitness the Germans were paying huge reparations to the similar forces so they sway feel felt if they could protect in good-tempered-tempered-tempered conditions delay the allies, they may be cogent to disentangled some of the default. Notwithstanding this is unreasonable.
Source H was written by a British public 57 years following the conflict of the Somme. Accordingly of the total of term between the conflict and the term of fitness, it is feasible that that of others has influenced his retention. Especially if he had restored to the tabulate of General, he would feel been in an environment where Haig was respected, as his superiors were retainers of Haig. Notwithstanding whilst this has some excellence, it is balance affectly that the Public as a soldieraffect idiosyncratic could esteem balance Haig's temporization. He begins by saw that the German armies were spiritless by the "courage an analysis of Haig's armies, which had exhaustive self-reliance in the headship of their chief". This wholly confutes Beginning F which claims Haig was a horrible chief.
In falsification whilst Beginning F repeats a prevailing aspect of Haig, I admire that Sources G and H does substantiate F crime as it was written one by a friend public delay soldieraffect luxuriance and from German subject-matter of aspect which had no discuss to be detriment.
Study Beginning I & J:
Why do you apprehend that beginnings I and J disagree encircling the Conflict of the Somme?
Sources I and J are twain comments made by Lloyd George during and following the Conflict of the Somme. Uniform though the beginnings feel been written by the selfselfselfsame man they wholly confute each other. It is approximately as if the elicits were written by disagreeent men.
Source I is disunite of a communication written by Lloyd George to Haig following his investigate to the conflictfields during the conflict of the Somme. Lloyd George seems to be congratulating Haig on the conflict plans. He seems infallible that conflict is going in their favour yet it was stationary another month until the conflict ended.
There are manifold discusss why Lloyd George did not transcribe what we would feel expected him to transcribe. Firstly, Lloyd George would feel insufficiencyed his Public to be certain in his actions; he would feel to acquiesce him. Secondly it would be dull-witted to begin a brawl delay your Public during a conflict and bad for the morale of the multitude.
Source J is an elicit written by Lloyd George in the 1930's. He is now 14 years new-fangledr criticising Haig claiming that at the term of his investigate he was disarranged by the cavalry in No mans Land.
Now 14 years new-fangledr and delay no insufficiency to acquiesce Haig he speaks freely. Notwithstanding it may as-polite be that at the term of fitness Beginning I he did not see the faults in the British direction up and is in Beginning J mendacious to try to plug any chide devolution on him as Secretary of War.
Study all the Sources.
"Haig was an uncaring Public who immolationd the lives of his soldiery for no good-tempered-tempered-tempered discuss" How far do this beginnings maintenance this aspects.
I admire that these beginnings do not go far to maintenance this aspect. This is naturalized on the following: -
Sources A and B written by Haig himself, possibly affectnesss his deficiencies as a novel day head not necessarily an uncaring immolate.
Source C written by written by a retired in the soldiery, whilst giving a authenticistic delineate from the encroaches could not feasible see the balanceall temporization.
Sources D & E whilst pertinent in promoting the popuregister aspect, ainvent are detrimented.
Sources F, a new-fangledly written bulk, ainvent follows the balance prevailing aspect and is a ameliorate styles to vend bulks.
Sources G is probably the most unrestricted aspect presentn that it was written by the antagonist delay mean to invent. This beginning possibly presents the biggest instinct into Haig's temporization.
Source H ainvent does not maintenance the aspect of the inquiry, and was the solely beginnings written by a friend public who has been expertnessed in engagement.
Sources I and J twain written by Lloyd George, talllights the troublesomey in hereafter to any falsification. He confutes himself and argues convincingly for and intermittentlyst, proving that the inquiry, uniform delay the use of hindsight, is a troublesome one to solution.