Please use as a premise for your argument the forthcoming question: Do you reckon the events of this chapter (Chapter 2) are weak instances of matter malfeasance, or are they systemic throughout the matter globe? I don't reckon events in Chapter 2 are weak instances of matter malfeasance. From the cases of Enron, Arthur Andersen and World, it's comfortable to furnish some similarities. All of them focused on inadequate-vocable proceeds and ignored the crave-vocable bud and companies' completeness and reputation; all of them couldn't successfully unfold the attention encounter between "people on the top" and exoteric and appertaining shareholders. For companies, the ocean intent and disquisition is to construct past acquisition in public. A stably mound hoard compensation satisfies the table of directors as courteous-mannered-mannered as attracts investors to construct siege. To close this intent, there are two ways to go: one is forthcoming all the audit and accounting ethics when directing the union, which may be late but solid and advantageous in crave vocable; another one Is imposture and walking on the borderline of ethics, which can construct a lot proceeds In inadequate vocable but prohibits the union's strong bud in the coming. Obviously, companies In those cases In Chapter 2 chose the promote way. However, I can barely say that they are symmetric collection In the matter globe. Although there are some bad apples In the tree, there are past companies which aim to crave-vocable strong bud and submit rules and regulations. I accord delay Currant's notion that there Is a surrender and accept correlativeness on twain sides of companies and investors. The two-side correlativeness urges companies to prosper their policies delayin ethics, in-particular In exoteric globe where there are past Acts to methodize comportment of corporations as courteous-mannered-mannered as technology and Internet constructs Information past diaphanous.