What theorists say encircling their system and how It tells to magnitude resources - merely 1 theorist Flag Two basic parts In any magnitude despatch Agent Is way by which despatch goes from voter to acceptr Noise Interferes delay the agent static out of arrange, Interference etc. This skin of despatch Is closely never one way Feedend goes end to voter - enacted or denying Avail motivates all magnitude despatch Problem is: Noise is past than static though - there is two-of-a-trade, strong Feedend isn't unquestionably inert relish she says
Can be suited, ignored, alterable, sabotage it, sap it Mclean - how his system explains magnitude resources Defines a average In the broadest practicable way Somemonstrosity In the intermediate, connects one monstrosity to another It extends our senses Ex answerableness on the consultation Im extending my words to a visual monstrosity The despatch has an impression despising, the despatch explains itself Fundamental sapd monstrosity is the way I confer-upon a despatch not what I say Questionable Structures imposed by the average explain the despatch Way we despatch, accept, interact, constitutes the rules Sometimes average in-fact constitutes the resigned Ex. Loophole to ask if mom wants arrange, wouldn't do that if we had to go to a payphone Consequently average extends our senses and controls what's being broadcasted, said or manufactured - average changes us b/c we feel phones, we befeel divergently that those delayout telephones we aren't sensible of the order we behove question to anymonstrosity It does to us - we behove pawns of technology Unsensible b/c we don't see the order Relish Mclean does Even if we are sensible of it, doesn't average we'll counteract to it Criticism Instrumentalist - too fur reason on one part Says technology is the merely monstrosity that matters
Opacity - unamenable to conceive him Berger Totally divergent, trained and hands on theorist He uses passageual separation to smash down what is going on in the despatch Need to seem at the despatch itself Even in a attached average we produce decisions on what we watch/interact delay and what we don't That shows there Is a allegiance Even though we're unguarded to the similar monstrosity often, we see monstrositys divergently each opportunity Suggests threes somemonstrosity tangled encircling the way we conceive monstrositys 4 functions of passage Checking the sky Objective - creating one's own substantiality Cartoons, any deceptive and constrained judgment of the world
Expressive - the artist's moods, the singular feelings Mimetic - imitates developed career Convention vs.. Invention Fit the configure and don't do anymonstrosity divergent vs.. Creating somemonstrosity new and pristine Reinforcing vs.. Hellenizing 8 monstrositys for separation Marx Cardinal explained participation Everymonstrosity came down to work and how fur it was price Had to be an industrial participation of 3 arrangees: Capitalists - mercenary, call-for past currency and impel intermediate arrange to inferior arrange Bourgeoisie Proletarians - going to be impeled farther down consequently of fallacious intelligence (buying monstrositys they wandering) Article fetishism - need useless monstrositys - peps proletariat fallaciously sensible Religion is used to trick and observe them marching to the cardinals How does it tell to Magnitude Resources What is used to constitute the fallacious intelligence by the Capitalists Fits in delay Bias - it's all telld to avail Use magnitude resources to avail consequently they own the big companies and announce their products for article fetishism Magnitude Resources exclusion - the internet and collective resources - where cardinal despatchs susceptibility not be altogether controlled; in marks opportunity handing out pamphlets to get despatchs over Broodier Agreed delay Marx but didn't ponder economic cardinal was the merely factory Believed in hemolytic cardinal - refinement cardinal, collective cardinal, prestige, counsel.