Discussion post and paper | Education homework help


(Discussion Post)

To qualify for this Discussion, cogitate Event 13.2, “How Safe Is Safe?” on pages 351–352 of Northouse (2016) and revisal the Albert, Reynolds, and Turan (2015), Lawton and Páez (2015), Hoover and Pepper (2015), and Gustafson (2013) doctrines supposing in this week’s Learning Resources.

Post your contact of holy frameworks to the holy fix posed in the event examine. In your contact, do the following:

  • Justify your designed explication, and illustrate the forced you used to reach at your explication. 
  • Incorporate the justifications you supposing in counter-argument to the Event 13.2. 
  • Apply the holy framework(s) outlined in the Learning Resources or in other literary study that aligns after a while your forced. Illustrate how your forced aligns after a while those frameworks. 

Be stable to subsistence your is-sue after a while a stint of two biased citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or further additional literary sources.

(Paper)

To qualify for this Assignment, ponder of a standing where a commencement team encountered a standing where things did not go courteous and they were faced after a while an holy fix. Analyze what could accept happened had they applied the expend determinations. Offer your explications using an holy framework.

Submit a 4-page partition (notwithstanding secure page and References exception) of the holy standing. Your partition must conceive the following:

  • A pigmy (1 stipulation) explication of the holy fix
  • An explication of the holy frameis-sue that, if applied by the construction to frame its determination, would accept established the holy fix, including subsistence for your partition from literary research
  • An trial of twain the actual and indirect consequences of the determination, including the trade-offs that the commencement of the construction made in making their determination