Case study 16,18,and 22 | English homework help


How would you dictate these manifestations. All you insufficiency to do is stipulate how you would dictate each contingency.

 

CASE STUDY Number:  16

 

Ethical Guidelines addressed in this contingency:

2.13 Fees, Financial Arrangements, and Stipulations of Consultation

a) As coming as practictalented in a functional or or-laws interdependence, the proceeding analyst and the client or other misapply predicament of proceeding analytic benefits stretch an harmony specifying remuneration and billing analystents.

c) Prior to the instrumentation of benefits the proceeding analyst earn stipulate in despatches the stipulations of ttalented delay respect to biased requirements for providing benefits and the trust of all parties (a curtail or Declaration of Functional Services) (pg 303).

 

2.16 Interrupting or Terminating Services

b) When entering into possession or curtailual relatiagreementehavior analysts stipulate for equtalented and misapply unravelling of trust for client trouble in the incident that the possession or curtailual interdependence ends, delay supreme motive consecrated to the luck of the client.

c) Proceeding analysts do not forfeit clients. Proceeding analysts conclude a functional interdependence when it becomes reasonably manifest that the client no craveer insufficiencys the benefit, is not benefitting, or is substance harmed by continued benefit.

 

6.06 Conflicts delay Organizations

If the demands of an construction delay which proceeding analysts are affiliated encounter delay these Guidelines, proceeding analysts release the disposition of the encounter, perform notorious their commitment to these Guidelines, and to the quantity practicable, affect to dictate the encounter in a way that permits the fullest supply to these Guidelines.

 

Resolve the manifestation: 

            According to Guideline 2.16, a proceeding analyst should not forfeit clients; benefits should simply be concluded if the client no craveer insufficiencys the benefit, the client is not benefitting, or the client is substance harmed. In this biased contingency, it would be unholy for the proceeding analyst to forfeit clients on the account of pay. Antecedently discontinuing benefits, the stipulater should set up a discourse to pass remuneration and billing orderments, as eminent in Guideline 2.13 respecting Fees, Financial Arrangements and Stipulations of Ttalented (Bailey & Burch 2011).The teach confine and the benefit stipulater should construct a written curtail respecting acquittal. In this contingency the benefit stipulater is faced delay encounter delay her employer, the teach confine. As eminent in guideline 6.06, the proceeding analyst is holyly obligated to try to dictate the encounter adhering to the guidelines (Bailey & Burch, 2011). To dictate this manifestation, the benefit stipulater should face the teach confine respecting her pay, order a discourse, and construct a written curtail respecting paymen

Case Study #18:

 

Primary Holy Issue: A proceeding analyst is asked to flourish a contrived interference of a top-equivocation by a clinical psychologist for a 10 year old respecting her insubordination at teach (said psychologist has not observed the offshoot at teach). The proceeding analyst noticed the top-equivocation interference is not instituted and wonders if she should bear this to the parent’s regard. The parents are adamant encircling the proceeding analyst flourishing the top-equivocation since they enjoy been delay the clinical psychologist for a crave span. The proceeding analyst is a fairly new BCBA and doesn't deficiency to perform the injustice impact on the race.

 

 

Ethical Guideline(s) Addressed in this Case:

 

1.04: Integrity

(a) “Behavior analysts are correct and upright. The proceeding analyst flourishs through on covenants and functional commitments delay noble peculiarity achievement and refrains from making functional commitments that he/she cannot keep” (p. 60).

 

2.10: Composition Efficacy

(a) “The proceeding analyst constantly had the trust to commend or-lawsally befriended most cogent composition proceedings. Cogent composition proceedings enjoy been validated as having twain crave-term and short-term benefits to clients and association” (p. 87).

(b) “Clients enjoy a equittalented to cogent composition (i.e., grounded on the exploration study and suited to the identical client)” (p. 87).

(c) “Behavior analyst are binding for resurvey and appraisal of mitigated proceeds of all choice compositions, including those stipulated by other disciplines and no interference” (p. 87).

(d) “In those instances where past than one or-lawsally befriended composition has been established, appended factors may be considered in selecting interferences, including, but not poor to, aptitude and cost-effectiveness, risks and side-proceeds of the interferences, client vill, and practitioner proof and training” (p. 88).

3.05: Describing Program Objectives

“The proceeding analyst describes, in despatches, the objectives of the proceeding veer program to the client or client-surrogate antecedently trying to instrument the program. And to the

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    2

 

 

quantity slight, a risk-benefit anatomy should be conducted on the proceeding to be instrumented to stretch the objective” (p. 114-115).

 

4.0: The Proceeding Analyst and the Identical Proceeding Veer Program

“The proceeding analyst (a) designs programs that are grounded on proceeding analytic principles, including assessments of chattels of other interference methods, (b) involves the client or the client-surrogate in the intentionning of such programs, (c) accomplishs the agree of the client, and (d) commendations the equittalented of the client to conclude benefits at any span” (p. 120).

 

4.04: ApprovingInterventions

“The proceeding analyst must accomplish the client's or client-surrogate's plaudit in despatches of the proceeding interference proceedings antecedently instrumenting them” (p. 122-123).

 

4.08: Program Modifications

“The proceeding analyst modifies the program on the account of grounds” (p. 126).

 

4.09: Program Species Consent

“The proceeding analyst teachs program species and the reasons for the speciess to the client or client-surrogate and accomplishs agree to instrument the speciess” (p. 126).

 

7.0 The Proceeding Analyst's Holy Trust to the Opportunity of Proceeding Analysis.

“The proceeding analyst has a trust to living the values of the opportunity, to scatter understanding to the notorious, to be accustomed delay these guidelines, and to cow disfigurement by non-certified identicals” (p. 159).

 

9.01 Furtherance in Society

“The proceeding analyst should excite the application of proceeding principles in association by presenting a proceedingal choice to other proceedings or methods” (p. 175).

 

 

Resolve the manifestation:

The proceeding analyst should admit grounds on her contemplation in the classroom so he/she is talented to living her thoughts encircling the top-equivocation not instituted. After she has collected plenty grounds she should unite delay the parents and argue her findings. He/She could too unite delay twain parents and clinical psychologist to argue her findings on the top-equivocation not substance cogent and the reasons she thinks it jurisdiction not be instituted (possibly its not reinforcing anymore). He/She can too intimate a new interference intention, grounded on illustration grounded methods and  adapt the top equivocation to it if the parents are adamant encircling having an interference grounded on it.

 

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    3

 

Case Study #22:

Primary Holy Issue: The proceeding analysts are promoting and assisting to instrument proceeding interferences that are not illustration grounded. Their forced is that "if it doesn't torment anyone or my benefits then I don't insufficiency to tantalize encircling it substance unethical".

 

 

Ethical Guideline(s) Addressed in this Case:

 

1.01: Reliance on Or-laws Knowledge

“The proceeding analyst maintains the noble standards of functional proceeding of the functional construction” (p. 58).

 

2.10: Composition Efficacy

(a) “The proceeding analyst constantly had the trust to commend or-lawsally befriended most cogent composition proceedings. Cogent composition proceedings enjoy been validated as having twain crave-term and short-term benefits to clients and association” (p. 87).

(b) “Clients enjoy a equittalented to cogent composition (i.e., grounded on the exploration study and suited to the identical client)” (p. 87).

(c) “Behavior analyst are binding for resurvey and appraisal of mitigated proceeds of all choice compositions, including those stipulated by other disciplines and no interference” (p. 87).

 

8.0: The Proceeding Analyst's Trust to Colleagues

“Behavior analysts enjoy an covenant to bear regard to and dictate holy permutations by adjutants” (p. 166).

 

8.01: Holy Violations by Behavioral and Non-behavioral Colleagues

“When proceeding analysts respect that there may enjoy been an holy permutation by another proceeding analyst, or non-behavioral adjutant, they try to dictate the manifestation by bearing it to the regard of that identical if an informal unravelling appears misapply and the interference does not ravish any confidentiality equitables that may be complicated. If unravelling is not accomplished, and the proceeding analyst respects a client's equitables are substance ravishd, the proceeding analyst may admit appended steps as essential for the refuge of the client” (p. 167-168).

 

 

 

Resolve the manifestation:

 

The proceeding analyst should bear to the regard of the other proceeding analysts how unholy it is to excite compositions that are not illustration grounded and teach how that is a permutation of the holy guidelines for a proceeding analyst (Guideline 2.10a). He/She should remind the other proceeding analysts the equittalented of the client to enjoy an cogent composition and their trust to excite these illustration grounded compositions simply. If reluctant to bung the furtherance of non-illustration grounded compositions then the proceeding analyst in inquiry should

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    4

 

 

admit appended steps to reverberation the locality and secure that the client is getting the best slight benefit they can.

 

 

 

 

References:

 

Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2011). Appendix A: Proceeding Analyst Certification Board Guidelines for Binding Conduct for Proceeding Analysts. Ethics for proceeding analysts (2nded) (pp. 293-322). New York: Routledge

 

Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2011). Appendix C: Fifty Ethics Scenarios for Proceeding Analysts. Ethics for proceeding analysts (2nded) (pp. 331-352). New York: Routledge