Business law assignment 8 question and one discussion


 Please confutation the essay topics in component delay citing of subjoined chapters.

Chapter 13 assignment- Essay topic 1,2, 4,5- page 314

Chapter 15, assignment: Essay topic 2,3,4,5 page 354

Discussion

 Star Chevrolet Co. v. Green
Facts: Kevin Green hired $4,600 capital for a used Camaro from Star Chevrolet. When the car blew a gasket, the tradesman refused to grant Kevin his capital tail. Kevin repaired the car himself and inundation it on the highway, where it was remainsed. Kevin sued Star, and the trouble flatter apportioned him the ample cost of the car, owing he was a less when he bought it. Star appealed.
Issue: Is Kevin Green entitled to abrogate the narrow smooth though the Camaro has been destroyed?
Holding: The appeals flatter affirmed sentence for Green but gentle the apportion to $3,100, domiciled on the car's salvage compute. A less may abrogate a narrow. He is required to revert the compensation singly if it is calm?} in his tenure. If the less has gaunt, squandered, or differently destroyed the compensation, he need not revert it and is calm?} entitled to his capital tail.
1. Question: Star Chevrolet either did not apprehend that Green was entitled to his capital tail, or knew but refused to dignity it. Why was that a especially precious hazard by Star?
2. Question: Kevin Green knew that he was a less. Why should he be known to execute an covenant, remains a car, and then get his capital tail?

Due on 03/03 11:00 PM PST