NR529 Module 1 Collaboration cafe and Reflection 2 question and answer

Description

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NR529 Module 1 Collaboration cafe and Reflection 2 question and answer
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

   

Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Collaboration Café Guidelines and
Grading Rubric
Purpose
In specific weeks of the course, you will have the opportunity to collaborate with your classmates in the Collaboration Café for a
graded assignment. The point value of the weekly assignment can be worth either 30 or 50 points, and the point value will be
identified on each assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive process among the students. Faculty participation will be
minimal; however, faculty will monitor this section for compliance and clarification.
Due Date

The suggested due date for the primary and responsive postings is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of the week that corresponds
with the module (e.g., Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2 for the Collaboration Café in Module 2).

All Collaboration Cafés must be submitted by Monday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Module 8 with the exception of the Module 8
Collaboration Café. The due date for Module 8 is Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Total Points Possible: 50 points (30 points for some instances)
Requirements
In the graded Collaboration Café, students are expected to post their initial response and then interact with at least two different
classmates during that module for a total of three postings per Collaboration Café worth 50 points, and two postings per
Collaboration Café worth 30 points.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022
Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference,
APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these,
you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism. In addition, proper grammar is expected. Faculty may
submit the discussion to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments
toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week.
A substantive post will include the following.
• Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner
• Demonstrates application of course concepts
• Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice
• Responds to classmates with an extended description instead of merely agreeing
GRADING RUBRIC
Category
Points
%
Description
Discussion content

25 (12)*
25%
Response to peers
15 (8)*
15%
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022


Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive
manner
Demonstrates application of course concepts
Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice



Includes substantive content that poses new ideas
Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue
Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner
Chamberlain University
APA, grammar, spelling, syntax,
and organizational flow
Collaboration Café Rubric
5
5%
Participation requirement
5
Total
50 (30)*
5%
100%

APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow of the content reflects
professional standards


Primary posting in response to the questions posed is present
Minimum of two responsive posts to peers. When the Collaboration Café is
worth 30 points, only one responsive post to a peer is required.
A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements.
*A score in parenthesis represents the 30 point scale.
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment
Criteria
Outstanding level of
performance
100%
Satisfactory level of
performance
86%
Deficient level of performance
68%
Unsatisfactory level of
performance
0%
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
25
12
22
10
17
8
0
Discussion
content
Presentation of information
includes all of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes two of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022
Presentation of information
includes one of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes none of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Chamberlain University


Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of
the topic to a specific
practice area
Collaboration Café Rubric


Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area


Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area


Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of
the topic to a specific
practice area
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
15
8
13
7
8
5
0
Response to
peers
Presentation of information
includes all of the following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that
prompt additional
dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes at least two of the
following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that prompt
additional dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes at least one of the
following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that prompt
additional dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful and
constructive manner
Presentation of information
includes none of the following.
• Includes substantive
content that poses new
ideas
• Asks questions that
prompt additional
dialogue
• Adds to the discussion
topic in a meaningful
and constructive manner
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
5
4
3
0
APA, grammar,
and syntax
There are no errors in the posts.
There are 1-2 errors in the posts.
There are 3-4 errors in the posts.
There are 5 or more errors in the
posts.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022
Chamberlain University
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
5
Student answers the question or topic on one day and interacts with at
least two other classmates in a particular module for the week.
In the 30-point rubric, the student interacts with at least one other
classmate in a particular module for the week.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_10/26/2022
Collaboration Café Rubric
0
Student did not meet this requirement.
Module Reflective Discussion Guidelines
and Rubric
PURPOSE
The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned
during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning
within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes.
DUE DATE


Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session.
Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session
and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS
REFLECTION OVERVIEW
This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this
course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first
week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course
session.
For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module,
and respond to the following questions.
Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you
hope to learn during this module of study?
Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding
the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome
addressed during this module.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
1
REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above.
3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph
structures.
4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions.
REFLECTION CRITERIA
Category
Points
%
Description
Reflection 1
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student
hopes to learn during this module.
Reflection 2
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in
this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course
outcome addressed in this module.
Timeliness of
Postings
3
20%
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made
before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT.
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
2
Total
15
100%
A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above
requirements.
GRADING RUBRIC
Reflection
Criteria
Met
Not Met
Reflection 1
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and describes
what the student hopes to learn during this
module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly
describe what the student hopes to learn during
this module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
1.
Reflection 2
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a
minimum of one course outcome
addressed in this module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet
one or both of the following criteria.
• Describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module.
• Connects learning achieved to a minimum
of one course outcome addressed in this
module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
2.
Timeliness of
Postings
3 Points
0 Points
The following expectations for timely postings
are met:
One or more of the following expectations for
timely postings are not met:
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
AND
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
0 Points Deducted
Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced
by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3 Points Deducted
One or more errors is present in any of the
following areas.






Grammar
Spelling
Word usage
Punctuation
Sentence structure
Paragraph structure
4
NR529 Module 1: Collaboration Café (graded)
Due: 10/29
Imagine a case scenario where you are the nurse leader for a clinical healthcare
environment of your choosing. As the nurse leader, you have been asked to determine
the best patient care delivery model to use on the unit. Consider this situation and
respond to the following.
What two patient care delivery models could be considered for use within the
clinical healthcare environment you identified? Describe how each model would
support safe, high-quality, person-centered care.
• What decision-making model would you apply to facilitate selection of the model
best suited for the environment, and what steps would you take to apply the
model?
• What leadership competencies will be needed to implement the new model?

As you respond to peers, consider the similarities and differences between the models
presented.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP